Replies to post #109673 on Winning Brands Corporation (WNBD)

[Serenity]

I can see where you are coming from. I truly can but I always side on knowing all of the facts..no matter what they are. Information is power. I think he is down playing it given his overly cautious nature but as suggested by my friend JRhino... I am trying to not have any expectations.

Reality for me is no matter what the IIS says... I'm not going anywhere. I simply want to know what this huge piece of the puzzle looks like for all involved.

IMO

[scupscup]

i believe numbers here will be over 1 million in revs for the year of 2009.

1000 stores x $4 (1 bottle a day) = $4,000 in revs a day


$4,000 revs x 7 days a week = $28,000 in a week.


$28,000 revs per week x 52 weeks = $1,456,000 a year.

this is for 1 product 1 size in 1000 stores.


jmho

[User-65225]

Regardless, these number will give us a basis to compare growth too, going forward... This, along with the whole transparency thang, is the only significance i see in releasing the numbers at this time.

Valuing this company based on CURRENT numbers is faulty IMO... You have to look at what they've done and where they're headed to see the TRUE potential.

9 times out of 10 a stock with interest will reflect FUTURE potential, not past results.... One major USA chain is worth more than ALL of the revs they have now IMO and what are the odds of landing a major USA chain (or more) at this point?

PS: Personally, I think it would be good for the stock to put out low numbers, then give sales updates in 2010 that proves growth it accelerating past that point.