InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

StephanieVanbryce

10/22/04 12:16 PM

#76161 RE: ergo sum #76157

LOL, need you ask?
icon url

wstera2

10/23/04 4:53 AM

#76310 RE: ergo sum #76157

So much for free speech. I guess your focus will be on the
lawyers & not on the real travesty liberals have caused by
trampling the rights of others. And it's not just the
theater where they are doing it too.....

But then focusing on tertiary matters will allow you to
ignore the real issues, won't it?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46338-2004Oct19.html

Anti-Kerry Film Won't Be Aired
Democrats, Investors Push TV Conglomerate to Alter Broadcast Plans

Philly-Area Theater Cancels Screening Of Anti-Kerry Film
http://www.nbc10.com/entertainment/3831507/detail.html

Film canned; tempers flare
By JODI ARTHUR
The Intelligencer
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/113-10202004-386047.html

Anti-Kerry Film Withdrawn From Movie Theater
http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/3839880/detail.html
icon url

OrangeFluffyCat

10/23/04 5:10 AM

#76311 RE: ergo sum #76157

What really squelched the movie in theaters was the Viet Nam vet that came out promising to sue because he was portrayed in an untruthful manner derogatorily. Theaters dropped it like a hotcake rather than get sued.

Sinclar had to cave
A. because it knows it's action is wrong
B. consumers exercised their option to protest
C. Sinclar is being sued by shareholders for their irresponsibility and for alleged short sales of stock
D. they had delivered just cause for people to file complaints with FCC and protest renewal of their licenses
E. Sinclair is heavily in debt and can be pushed over the brink, not that the insiders mind, they sold most/all their stock at highs this year
F. Kerry etal rightfully asked for equal time
G. Someone popped up with the money, private couple, to buy an hour's time and air pro-Kerry
Sinclair couldn't allow any pro Kerry programming.