InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mathias1

11/07/09 4:40 PM

#15915 RE: catchmeifyoucan #15914

catchme: If you read the things, it says the financials were put together using methods "generally accepted."

This is not a full audit. It's probably guesswork...very very vague.

And audit would have been disasterous.
icon url

igotthemojo

11/08/09 8:33 PM

#15917 RE: catchmeifyoucan #15914

oh im sure its very true and accurate as well...

"If in fact, it's true that he is pursuing new income avenues and moves forward with them"

i as a mater of fact am also pursuing new income avenues and moving forward with them...last week i bought a lotto ticket...i intend to buy another this coming week...

these statements from pm mean nothing...so it doesnt matter who is watching him..

so after all the pr's about multi million dollar deals with major corporations around the world, millions in up front money in the bank and sales of phones occuring in unnamed places, he in fact admits to zero sales, zero money and no deals anywhere...

what a shock..lmao
icon url

PRmaniac

11/09/09 12:23 PM

#15921 RE: catchmeifyoucan #15914

catch - posting stuff not true?

Remember the noticre and the date of the shareholder meeting for 2009.

Why did it take actual DD to find out the hotel no longer had a shareholder meeting for HOP-ON scheduled. There was a preliminary reservation, but no confirmation from HOP-ON.

then we find that strange PR about Peter declaring a quorum at a meeting (no admission that there EVER was a meeting at the location in the earlier PR) and he was re-elected. No disclosure if the quorum was the result of his preferred shares and if ANYONE else was at the meeting.
icon url

PRmaniac

11/09/09 12:37 PM

#15922 RE: catchmeifyoucan #15914

Catch - more stuff not necessarily seems to be true

Did you notice that hop-on had many pictures of phones that were "available now" on their website, yet they recorded $0 in sales/revenue and a huge decline in assets, with no money in the bank at all, during their last reporting period.

I'm not sure how you can defend the man, when there is so much evidence (including his felony conviction) that should make one more than a little skeptical.