Replies to post #2453 on Nutra Pharma Corp (NPHC)

[Probart]

"(2) NPHC was NOT looking to create a homeopathic drug. They came to the FDA with all the studies to date, and what they had for an effective ratio (4X to 5X) that would provide pain relief benefit without harmful effects and the FDA told them it qualified as a homeopathic. So they went with that." I really liked hearing this in the conference call, tells me they wanted to go the FDA route and were told by the FDA it was not necessary.

The CEO of this company has most of the bases covered and has a mind sharper than a tack!

[Degreed]

Finally a good post. Why can't people have a grown up discussion like GreenMan without getting all riled up? Listen how stupid this sounds "NPHC went to the FDA and the FDA said you have a homeopathic drug here" the reason is there are no real clinical studies proving any of their drugs work that's why.

That is what it is you can spin it however you want, but drug companies have to prove their drugs work in studies, trials, with successful end points, and efficacy results. NPHC doesn't have any of this so of course it will be a OTC drug.

Now if it proves harmful, causes rashes, etc etc then it may get pulled becauses again no studies using Cobroxin.


Answer 1 question what makes you more money a drug sold via "OTC market" or a FDA approved drug with studies proving it really does what that label says it does?

The answer is easy!! If Cobroxin was really that awesome the studies would be done and FDA approval would be a no brainer, right? Then how big would the market be obviously 10's of billions!!

Call me doubting Thomas when it comes to wild claims from OTC medications. Doesn't mean the stock won't run or that Americans won't buy it.