Still awaiting the confirmation of money in the bank. and Still waiting for the DTCC chill to be lifted (the shorters would have still been shorting, wouldn't they?)
In other words, can we believe that the DTCC would have done this regardless of the SEC suit because IPWG wasn't named and perhaps they could have found any reason. it seems they did easily with that but I don't think they necessarily needed that. The DTCC does what it wants. That seems to be the consensus anyway?