InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ypsiCPA

10/20/09 6:14 PM

#29600 RE: lowman #29598

The high (and growing) insider ownership says a lot - 26.7% directly held, per transfer agent: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=42612075

Looking back at the September 23 Shareholder Letter http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20090923005796&newsLang=en , there's a lot going on:

We are working with consultants, negotiating with a number of medical device companies, medical instrument makers and bankers.

I'm confident that we'll hear about successfully concluded negotiations. I don't think it's in the company's best interest to release specifics about negotiations underway.

Also, don't overlook: Our Carbon Capture Technology, Inc. project is moving along, and we believe this will also be a key component of CSMG’s future.

Of course, Don has a fiduciary duty to the shareholders (even if he didn't, his large holding aligns his interests with ours). But no way should he focus on the short-term share price. I've seen enough fluff PR's with other investments, and am happy not to see them here.

Everyone should feel free to contact the company with questions or concerns:

CSMG Technologies, Inc.
Donald S. Robbins, 361-887-7546
President and CEO
or
K. Bruce Jones, 770-955-0409
icon url

micah211099

10/20/09 9:11 PM

#29602 RE: lowman #29598

I think you just re-made my point for me Low. Don's job is to do everything in his power to get the most out of our techs and grow the company. The part where I disagree with you is you seem to imply maybe Don is doing things specifically to stop thwart ST/flippers which is the part I think absurd.

Expecting a company to provide and reasonable amount of information to its shareholders is not an unreasonable expectation. Lack of information is why people get burned on things like with Madoff. I don't think I'm alone in feeling that one PR that said as little as possible in a years span as the only release of info from a company is below the level of reasonable expectations.

I'm not sure why any time anyone raises a reasonable concern with the company that you immediately start with the tounge in cheek personal shots and demeaning rhetoric. You can believe in a company's long term prospects without drinking the kool-aid 24-7 so to speak.