so why would that hold up the DTC? the DTC apparently says there are more COUNTERFEIT shares...
it doesn't fit the story...
the DTC knows who shorted they keep the books, if Stewie shorted without borrowing, which apparently someone did? the SEC would be prefering NS charges like they have been doing to others.
besides, Stewie could not be sure to get the shares in 2005, the shares he was issued were much later and they were preferred, not tradeable.
what was the final disposition of the Sentinel Case against Stewie ? what i saw looked like a dismissal.