InvestorsHub Logo

micah211099

10/20/09 3:14 PM

#29594 RE: lowman #29593

Sorry Low but your absolutely incorrect. A CEO's responsibility is to his shareholders...period. If the CEO is wasting his time worrying about LT vs ST he's not doing his job because it should be irrelevant to him.

If Don cared even a little about the people who held on faithfully for the last year of silence he owes them at least some release of information. Another month of silent treatment after letting everyone know the gag is off is doing nothing but reinforcing the longs fear that they are wasting their time here.

I've been around this stock for probably three years now, look up some of my 07' posts if you like. But the dragging of the feet on moving this product to market is flat out ridiculous. The silence is inexcusable because the gag order excuse is gone now. You can only read so many posts about inside ownership, no reverse splits, and low O/S so many times before they are about to make you gag. I'm just glad I didn't heavily invest here a year ago.

rocketeer357

10/20/09 4:06 PM

#29596 RE: lowman #29593

Hmmmm, I don't recall too much complaining when the PPS was over 2 bucks...

I thought that asking questions about how a CEO runs a company was one purpose for discussion boards. You certainly have made the low O/S, insider buying, no r/s case well Lowman. And repeatedly. No one doubts that it's an important aspect of how the company is run. Unfortunately, barring revenue, actual instrument production or JV news, it's been the only worthy rallying point save for a couple of patents and some legal matters.

But why do you always dismiss valid concerns and questions, especially given the lack of news over the past year?

texasspeculator

10/20/09 11:44 PM

#29604 RE: lowman #29593

"A CEO does NOT have ANY responsibility to short-term shareholders, despite what 'they' may say." I do believe that LEGALLY a CEO has the same responsibility to any and all shareholders no matter what ANYONE may say.