Replies to post #719 on The Options Box (OBOX)

[bbgold]

Newton's Mom would not approve Eh?
They sound like the type that a mother would not approve of <GG>. Well, so far we have some Good indications this morning, so far. The S&P Futures were down to 831 last night and actually recovered as high as 847 just before premarket trading. They then dropped to 837 and have just now recovered back to 839. If we do not move any lower than 831 then that might be a good sign of Support and we get some kind of a Bounce here today. Make sure to keep an eye on the Support levels to see if they hold.
Good Luck Fred and daughter! :^)

Good Luck to All! :^)
PLAN the TRADE and TRADE the PLAN!

[Koikaze]

Rationalization 213, Tuesdays, 8:00 to 10:00
Today's lesson, Rationalizing For Others, Examples

Yesterday, the meanderings on this board touched briefly on Newtonian Physics. I considered offering an example, but a delicate concern for propriety caused me to desist. After thinking about it, I've come to the conclusion that my view of decorum might be deemed archaic.

Furthermore, I haven't heard such theorems in many years and fear they may be lost in the dim mists of time. It's true they may still be learned (notice, I didn't say "taught") in math class, a milieu I no longer inhabit, but, in the absence of proof, I dare not risk their loss. I only know two of these theorems (although I suspect there are more), and I've successfully proven both.

Here's one:

"The angle of dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of the meat."

If that's a violation of the terms of use, Matt, I won't resist arrest. It was written with humor aforethought.

Fred

Postscript: If my writing is so poor that I need to add those silly little smiley faces or the g-things ... not g-strings, g-things ... like (g) or (G) or (ggg) ... I'd better stop posting messages immediately. FLG