<Half, I don't care what the loan agreement says, logic says that Smithline is shorting the stock. This is not just a few hundred thousand someone is shorting and no one has that number of cheap warrants for insurance.>
You couldn't be serious. Just because your opinion is that it isn't Smithline how can a legal binding agreement not be adhered to. Remember that quarter of a million dollar fine paid to Smithline for an error with the filing? Moro would love to catch Smithline in an illegal maneuver. It's not Smithline. That blows your theory. I think it is someone that has an agenda and is very immoral and greedy.
Answer is NO. It is in the contract written by attorneys. This is not a handshake deal. There is serious money at stake. Moro said No shorting. You read it. I see bigtime repercussions if Smithline did not abide by a legal contract.
<We have beaten this to death. See you next week.>
You don't like when your theories are proven wrong. Amusing.