InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

balihi

10/08/09 11:05 PM

#25352 RE: Kate4 #25348

Really?Think so?You forgot about the disabled veterans part.
icon url

Klonopin2mg2000

10/08/09 11:06 PM

#25354 RE: Kate4 #25348

and for the record kate4', what's your government contract and/or legal background to be able to state as fact...

"If they've received a contract as a subcontracter, then yes 10% would be generous.. "

this isn't an attack...like your's.....it's a simple question regarding EVRM and possible contract information which you can answer rather easily if you so choose, no?
icon url

GIBBER

10/09/09 1:36 AM

#25418 RE: Kate4 #25348

Great post. I believe this one is ligit. I agree with you if you raise any concern you get put down but I think this is fairly common on these boards after the stock gets noticed. The people that get in it in the last few weeks just want to protect their investment. Little do they release they do not influence the stock that much here on the board. People that bought in in the .04+ range are the first ones to jump on anyone that raises concerns to be discussed intelligently that they feel is negative. They drink the kool aid and cannot discuss any conerns you might have. These are the people that never call the company. I was on the phone today with the company. I have talked to the 8-10 times in the last 6 months. I have a good feeling on this company. You never know for sure with a pinkie the supposedly honest CEO could get greedy and dump shares at anytime or work with shorts to make money at the expense of the shareholders. It is always the Wild West here on the pink sheets.