Replies to post #37604 on Somatic Systems Inc (SMAS)

[ladyinwaiting]

What the heck JD, I'll stand with you. After all, for good or bad, I decided to buy this stock. That being said, what do I gain by being negative? Can't think of much. I may as well wait it out and see what happens. There are many here who don't believe anymore. So be it, they have their reasons, just as you have yours for believing. The concept is good, so lets just see where it goes and hope everyone can play nice in the playpen for a while.

gltu & all
lady

[Slojab]

You really MUST learn to separate the stock from the company and the company from the service they provide.

As has been pointed out before, this is a board for the discussion of SMAS, not for the principals or benefits of somatics as a therapy.

While as an aside issue that is naturally going to find it's way into the discussion mix, you're taking it to the extreme, where SMAS is the aside issue.

This kind of says it all.

"After seeing the healing results myself I'm so glad I owned this stock before I had the accident. I did not know a thing about somatics I just owned some stock micro named Smas."

Aside from this "coincidence", try to focus on why the stock is a good investment or a bad one.

"Somatics healed me pain-free without those companies. I believe there is a whole block of companies who bring opposition for this new wonderful healthcare system."

SMAS did nothing for you. Somatics did.

[bdogmike]

Ok, one more time here - There is NO military deal. I am active duty military and frequently visit the major military medical centers in support of wounded soldiers - not one senior medical or contracting person I have spoken with has even heard of this company. They have made NO contact with the military as I, or anyone else, can prove. If ANYONE can prove differently, please tell us all with the facts - in black and white. This preaching line is over a year old and never coming to fruition. On the same note, if the military did decide to use the system, they would probably just pay the $12,000 per class to certify their current personnel, not spend millions to add new people. In case no one is noticing, the military has made major cut backs in the hiring of civilians over the last year.

The company is not sticking to anything other than fleecing the poor souls who buy into this.

Somatic treatment is not provided only by this company, but by other companies who also have an inkling of business sense and remain private as this will never become a billion (or even a ten million) dollar company. It is hugely overvalued at this level by virtue of the current O/S. The only thing that MAY cause this to get away from .0001 land is a huge reverse split.

Do the math and find something else to dabble in. There are too many plays to miss while continuing down this road.

In the end, we all make our own decisions and I am sure I will be called a basher for this view. If it saves anyone reading here a little money, that's fine.

GLTA and have a great evening.

[pantherj]

SMAS is not sticking with anything Military related. They have never done one thing for the Military and they never will. You really need to stop trying to leave a false impression and imply that unless the posters here support SMAS they do not support our Troops.

i would take exception to your general statement that somatics is a proven form of health care. Just as any form of physical therapy, it probably can be of benefit. But, we're talking military here. Somatics doesn't patch up bullet holes, nor amputated limbs, nor heal burns.

No matter how effective, or ineffective, somatics might be; the topic here is about SMAS as a company. 15,000,000,000 shares outstanding, no bid for months, 5,000,000,000 unauthorized shares on the market, the second lowest possible rating by Pinksheets.com and a revoked corporate status. What part of that do you find admirable, JD?