joey this company lacks the one thing that causes the majority of these stocks to fail.
Capital.
It costs a lot of money to get this type of business to the point of being able to operate independently off of profits.
Their lack of assets also makes it nearly impossible to get adequate funding from a traditional source.
That means the only real way to fund operations is the continual issuance of shares. Let's be real, looking to an Opera House for funding an algae pond isn't exactly favorable.
Look at Exxon who is investing $600 million into the technology. That is simply seed money to achieve a product. It says nothing of actually making money off of that $600 million initially.
In their estimates it would take that just to put forth the proper R&D, acquire the proper equipment and produce a product on a scale that would make it viable.
It isn't a matter of BEHL surviving or failing based on what they want to do. It is all based on appropriate working capital and the ability to sustain ones operations before the investing public gets tired of seeing continued dilution and no results.
That's why they fail, not because they all had bad ideas or were scams.
BEHL can't fund any of these projects and teaming up with companies like INCL, a multi-billion share shell with 2 employees and little, if any, assets to try and come up with money is not going to cut it.
That is PR material only.
You have to actually look at it from top to bottom and determine how this company is going to sustain itself for months or perhaps years before turning a profit.
How will they do that? Can you come up with a viable plan for them to raise capital while protecting shareholder value at the same time?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
