Replies to post #214968 on Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[printmail01]

Yes , That same question needs to be answered to UPLIST, The way SPNGE plays games with RM , issuing stock and cancelling right before a filing , then reissuing it days later , plus funnelling it to SPNG/RME control persons is illegal , the SEC had a LONG list of similiar questions last timne SPNG tried to register shares thru prospectus , the minute these questions came up SPNG withdrew the offerings and tried to hide. Thus we have what we have today , SPNG issuing BILLIONS of "unregistered" shares , they failed to register shares thru prospectus offerings so they issue unregistered restricted stock and use the RME control relationship to manipulate the share structure and payment to officers imo , and YES to uplist these same questions , and many more will need to be answered in greater detail.

Go read all of the UPLOAD filings from SEC to SPNG
and ALL of SPNG answers to the SEC before they withdrew offering IN 2006. These same questions and many more still need to be answered, just becuase they failed to answer them in 2006 does not mean they dont have to answer them! lol.....

Here are the Links:

UPLOADS are SEC Questions:
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001201251&type=upload&dateb=&owner=include&count=40

CORRESP are the SPNG answers to the UPLOADS:
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001201251&type=CORRESP&dateb=&owner=include&count=40

Here is link to ALL SPNG SEC filings:
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001201251&owner=include&count=40

SEC is going to get these questions answered one way or another. Just becuase SPNGE chose to withdraw the offering when they could not correctly disclose and answer SEC questions in 2006 , does NOT mean they dont have to answer the questions......