InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

CYRXorbust

09/24/09 10:35 AM

#211908 RE: yellowdog1 #211898

that is exactly what they would have done. some people here would argue that D&T will take on any client that is willing to pay them which i don't believe to be the case but lets assume that is true. as soon as D&T were to find anything that appeared fishy they would have given SPNG the boot. the last thing they would want to do is piss off their existing clients because if D&T shows they are willing to work with crooks those companies might be deemed as shady.
icon url

KJ

09/24/09 10:37 AM

#211912 RE: yellowdog1 #211898

I believe D&T has caused much of this by requiring SPNG to do things that will be best for us in the long run..... These guys don't screw around and want every t crossed and i dotted.... Watch for things to start all coming together... Then the "chase" begins....

GO SPNG
icon url

alien42

10/20/09 4:35 PM

#241980 RE: yellowdog1 #211898

Yep. D & T is a huge positive for me. If it wasn't true, they would have put a pr out a long time ago that it was false. Woof.

D&T dropped SPNG. woof