Oaks, seeing as you are choosing to ignore my hard hitting commentary, extremely well made and relevant points,...and that of others here; how about, since you and Chown appear to be buddies, you kindly email him our comments, and tell him to come over here and address the issues we've raised.
Otherwise, I'm thinking the SEC might like to read that filing and see our comments.....
Though, I'm not up on what the SEC allows as to forward looking revenue projections, I think they might like to know that some of us feel said projections are preposterous, and impossible to achieve.
Are you sure Houlihan Gold Fund, LP is really associated with Houlihan, Smith & Company, Inc. If it is, how come the financing doesn't show for Noble or USCN? ... eom
Sara Jenkins The Blackwing Group, LLC Independence, MO To the Above-Named Respondents: WHEREAS, the North Carolina State Board of Certified Public Accountant Examiners (Board) is authorized by NCGS §93-12(16) to enforce the provisions of the North Carolina Certified Public Accountant Act (Act) through actions for injunctive relief regarding “a single violation” of this Chapter; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to NCGS §93-3 “It shall be unlawful for any person who has not received a certificate of qualification admitting him to practice as a certified public accountant to assume or use such a title, or to use any words, letters, abbreviations, symbols or other means of identification to indicate that the person using same has been admitted to practice as a certified public accountant.” WHEREAS, pursuant to NCGS §93-4 “It shall be unlawful for any firm, copartnership, or association to assume or use the title of certified public accountant, or to use any words, letters, abbreviations, symbols or other means of identification to indicate that the members of such firm, copartnership or association have been admitted to practice as certified public accountants, unless each of the members of such firm, copartnership or association first shall have received a certificate of qualification from the State Board of Certified Public Accountant Examiners admitting him to practice as a certified public accountant; provided, however, that the Board may exempt those persons who do not actually practice in or reside in the State of North Carolina from registering and receiving a certificate of qualifications under this section.” WHEREAS, pursuant to NCGS §93-5 “It shall be unlawful for any corporation to assume or use the title of certified public accountant or to use any words, letters, abbreviations, symbols or other means of identification to indicate that such corporation has received a certificate of qualification from the State Board of Certified Public Accountant Examiners admitting it to practice as a certified public accountant.” WHEREAS, pursuant to NCGS §93-6 “It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the public practice of accountancy in this State who is not a holder of a certificate as a certified public accountant issued by the Board, unless such person uses the term ‘accountant’ and only the term ‘accountant’ in connection with his Jenkins continued on page 6
name on all reports, letters of transmittal, or advice, and on all stationery and documents used in connection with his services as an accountant, and refrains from the use in any manner of any other title or designation in such practice;” and, WHEREAS, Respondent Sara Jenkins (hereinafter “Respondent Jenkins”) is not currently licensed or otherwise authorized by the Board as a certified public accountant and The Blackwing Group, LLC, (hereinafter “Respondent Blackwing”) is not currently registered by the Board as certified public accounting firm; and, WHEREAS, although Respondent Jenkins is or has been registered as a CPA in Missouri and Respondent Blackwing is or has been registered as a CPA firm in Missouri, neither has given notice or otherwise qualified to render an audit as a CPA or CPA firm for a North Carolina company. Further Respondents have had their licenses or registrations revoked in at least two other states for unlawful conduct. Nevertheless, without lawful authority Respondents prepared and issued a “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” on behalf of a North Carolina company. In said report Respondents made repeated references to regulatory bodies and official accounting and auditing standards to give the erroneous impression that Respondents were registered in North Carolina and lawfully permitted to use such means to indicate that they were CPAs in this state and thereby conveying the impression that they could lawfully provide an audit for New Millennium Products located in North Carolina for the purposes of registration with the United Securities and Exchange Commission. Such a representation has a capacity or tendency to deceive the public and is contrary to NCGS §93-3, §93-4, §93-5, and §93-6. THEREFORE, Respondent Jenkins and Respondent Blackwing are hereby notified and the North Carolina State Board of Certified Public Accountant Examiners demands that they immediately cease and desist from offering or rendering public accounting services of any kind in North Carolina unless and until Respondent Jenkins has been licensed as a CPA by the Board and Respondent Blackwing has been registered as a CPA firm by the Board. BY: Robert N. Brooks, Executive Director North Carolina State Board of Certified Public Accountant Examiners 10/01/2008 In lieu of civil proceedings authorized by NCGS §93-12(16), the Board will accept Respondent’s consent to this Demand. CONSENTED TO BY: Sara Jenkins The Blackwing Group, LLC 10/15/2008"
okie, ... Is this the Lee Ogle involved with Noble Technologies as revealed by the recent filing?
"On July 13, 2009, Lee Ogle and Frank Noland transferred one hundred six thousand, two hundred fifty shares (106,250) common shares in the capital stock of the Company (representing 100% of their joint holdings) to related parties, specifically P. Ogle, C. Egenes, J. Shibley and to P. Cox for .001 per share. This transaction involved previously issued common shares in the capital stock of the Company and therefore did not result any additional issuances of stock by the Company."
"SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
Litigation Release No. 16604 / June 22, 2000
SEC v. FLOYD LELAND OGLE, DONALD TABOR, KAILEY MINING CO., REUBEN PETERS, PETERS SECURITIES CO., LP, ALBINAS KURKULIS, ANDREW KURKULIS, PAUL KURKULIS, GARY COTTEN, AND ROBIN OPP, Civil Action No. 99 C 609 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division)
FORMER PRESIDENT OF EXSORBET INDUSTRIES, MARKET MAKER, AND RETAIL BROKERS IN MICROCAP FRAUD CASE TO PAY $2.3 MILLION IN SETTLEMENT WITH SEC
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on June 16, 2000, the U.S. District Court in Chicago, Illinois entered final judgments against Floyd Leland "Lee" Ogle, the former president of Exsorbet Industries, Inc. of Arkansas, and four other individuals in a microcap market manipulation fraud case involving cross-border trading in British Columbia, Canada. The court also entered final judgments against Reuben Peters of Chicago, a market maker in Exsorbet stock, and Chicago stockbrokers Albinas Kurkulis, Andrew Kurkulis, and Paul Kurkulis. These defendants consented to the judgments without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC's complaint. A default judgment was entered against former Exsorbet Executive Vice President Gary Cotten, who was convicted of criminal securities fraud in an unrelated case in New York last year. The final judgments ordered the defendants to pay over $2.3 million in disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and civil penalties. Permanent injunctions were also entered against all the defendants.
The SEC's complaint filed February 1, 1999, alleged that the defendants manipulated the price of Exsorbet stock, which was traded on the National Quotation Bureau pink sheets, the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, and the NASDAQ Small Cap Market, from $1 to $13 a share from November 1993 through February 1996, by giving or receiving bribes for participation in the manipulative scheme, controlled the floating supply of Exsorbet stock, artificially fixing the opening price at $5 on the first day of public trading on February 4, 1994, and illegally dominating and controlling the secondary market in the stock. Exsorbet Industries produced a peat moss oil absorbent product that was purportedly useful in environmental cleanup. The SEC also alleged extensive cross-border manipulation of Exsorbet's stock in British Columbia, Canada through wash sales and matched trades. The complaint further alleged that Lee Ogle and Gary Cotten issued a forged Environmental Protection Agency endorsement letter of Exsorbet's oil absorbent product, and issued a false press release stating that Exsorbet had obtained $5 million in contracts. The violations charged in the complaint were Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 10(b) and 15(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rules 10b-5, 10b-6, and 15c1-2 thereunder.
The court permanently enjoined Ogle, Peters, and the three Kurkulises from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws after they consented to the judgments without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC's complaint. Ogle was specifically enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 and Regulation M thereunder and Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and ordered to pay $571,000 in disgorgement of ill-gotten proceeds plus prejudgment interest of $230,419, and a civil penalty of $200,000. Reuben Peters was enjoined from violating Section 17(a)(2)-(3) of the Securities Act and was ordered to pay $205,000 in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest of $135,138, and a civil penalty of $25,000. Based on the entry of the judgment by the court, the SEC also ordered Peters suspended from association with any broker or dealer for a period of two months. Albinas Kurkulis was enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, Rule 10b-5, and Section 17(a)(1)-(3) of the Securities Act and ordered to pay $249,995 in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest of $83,965, and a civil penalty of $25,000. Based on the entry of the judgment by the court, the SEC also ordered Albinas Kurkulis barred from association with any broker or dealer with the right to reapply for association after three years to the appropriate self-regulatory organization, or if there is none, to the SEC. Paul Kurkulis was enjoined from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, Rule 10b-5, and Section 17(a)(1)-(3) of the Securities Act and ordered to pay $114,431 in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest of $38,453 and a civil penalty of $50,000. Andrew Kurkulis was enjoined from violating Section 17(a)(2)-(3) of the Securities Act and ordered to pay $172,708 in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest of $58,006 and a civil penalty of $20,000. Cotten was also permanently enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and was ordered to pay $161,349 in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest of $19,952 and a civil penalty of $200,000. The SEC dismissed its claims against Reuben Peters' securities firm, Peters Securities Co., L.P. The defendants who remain in the SEC's lawsuit are Ogle's Canadian business partner, Donald Tabor, and his Canadian company, Kailey Mining & Equipment Co., Ltd., and former San Diego stockbroker Robin Opp, against whom the SEC has filed a motion for a default judgment."
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
