InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dwalrus

09/18/09 11:47 AM

#3851 RE: coldasice #3850

"Death blow" I can see your not a fan of the reverse split. im not fan either for that matter..Im sure there is a reason were going to be voting on it..i would like to know more about that reason...I just have not seen anything from the company to justify a reverse split right now..give me a reason why we should even be voting on it..we have no revenues, 1 shipping agreament with fedex and no news of financing...so tell me mr. cryoport,,,why are we even voting on this reverse split..

icon url

Chudd185

09/18/09 11:55 AM

#3852 RE: coldasice #3850

Cryoport are you referencing me here?

"Perhaps if you picked up the phone and contacted the company or bothered to e-mail Mr. Fine, maybe you would have the answers you're searching for."


TMC

icon url

LongCYRX

09/18/09 12:00 PM

#3853 RE: coldasice #3850

Easy Cport, its getting hot in here. I appreciate your insight. All I can offer is opinions and analysis from time to time, I do not have any inside access. I am in contact with Mr. Fine quite often he typically can offer insight but nothing that everybody else can't find out. Cash is definitely the biggest problem and has been for a while, nobody is stating otherwise. It really is not a big deal if Fedex says our name or not but IMO telling our name to world couldn't hurt our chances or getting cash.

As for the meeting, it should be very informative and nice to be there, but Stambaugh will do what he wants and I am sure he understands the implications of a reverse split and would not do so if it was not deemed appropriate. I truly don't think that he would reverse split without any business or revenues for an artificial price hike, I believe he just wants to have it as a tool. A split on a company showing revenue and growth should not have a huge impact on valuation considering what the future would hold for a company attracting large business in a very large industry. The shareholder meeting filing repeatedly states certain actions are being purused to be in compliance with nasdaq requirements. Whether we can get there or not is another question. I agree that a reverse split typically has negative implications but it does not have to be a death sentence (AIG) just an available tool.

GLTA