Replies to post #5408 on Electronic Game Card, Inc (fka EGMIQ)

[GWMAN]

KJ, in case he is not around, you are correct. Unless I am brain dead today, I think Casino was just assuming the reader would get that he meant "reverse" split based on his description (or he was rushing and accidentally left it out).

A 2:1 reverse split has been what has been asked about on past conference calls and entertained by the board periodically.

I personally can handle it or can live without it. I have faith and a hunch that there may not be much difference in time (acouple months maybe) to NASDAQ between one path or the other.

[iancassel]

i actually wrote the ratio wrong...should be 1:2 reverse not 2:1

Yes, this would cut the sharecount in half, which would correspondingly double the share price.

My guess is they don't do a reverse though, but I would like them to do it.