Replies to post #68557 on Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[ergo sum]

I use the Wilson article so that you can see what he said. Show me where he is wrong. The best you can do or Hitchens can do is imply that Nigeria might have been involved. In the typical conservative way the argument then become a question of Wilson's character. Somehow he is suppose to know what his wife wrote in a classified memo. This is ridiculous. So we make up things as we go along. Like your earlier statement about the meomos.

" "There was no mention in the report of forged documents — or any suggestion of the existence of documents at all," Tenet wrote. For his part Wilson says he did not deal with the forgeries explicitly in his report because he never saw them. However, Wilson says he refuted the forgeries' central allegation that Niger had been negotiating a sale of uranium to Iraq.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,465270,00.html