InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dbernet

09/06/09 3:09 PM

#178365 RE: balance_builder #178364

Balance,

If it turns out to be C, and drilling results are at risked or better, then 10 or greater comes into play?

db
icon url

mz157

09/06/09 3:16 PM

#178367 RE: balance_builder #178364

e) none of the above. IMO
icon url

MIKE2OO5

09/06/09 3:56 PM

#178372 RE: balance_builder #178364

and you are? (just joking balance) but as we all know from one of our favorite posters NOBODY KNOWS NOTHIN!!! But I do agree one day we could be sold, or WILL be carried to first oil, either way is a win for all of us....
icon url

walldog0

09/06/09 4:45 PM

#178374 RE: balance_builder #178364

Once China knows there is Sweet Light Crude in....

commercial quantities, then ERHE is sold!, China is starving for this type of oil, it will see them thru until they can build additional refinery capacity that can handle Mid Eastern Sour Crude...imo

Carrying ERHE just doesn't jive with China's, spending its USA $$$, for assets around the globe.
icon url

sneak-attack

09/06/09 5:32 PM

#178375 RE: balance_builder #178364

BB: I know the following post is history with the AXC sale to SNP, What in this report would make SEO sellout early?

http://www.raymondjames.ca/rjl_marketing/dotca/en_CA/Equity%20Capital%20Markets/Equity%20Research/Sample%20Research/Sample%20Research%20PDFs/InternationalOilGasReport061608.pdf


looking forward to your viewpiont
Sneak
icon url

doubleaa

09/06/09 8:50 PM

#178388 RE: balance_builder #178364

C
"o)
AA
icon url

nh

09/06/09 9:02 PM

#178390 RE: balance_builder #178364

C gets my vote. It leaves a speculative 'gap' for both sides to jockey with and gives SEO his best possible upside: part proven in the best 2 blocks, part gap. If these first two blocks are home runs then the gap is even more interesting. If the first two blocks are average or lackluster (which I doubt), then there is still the gap. It would be interesting for the board to come up with some options and take a vote.
icon url

midtieroil

09/06/09 11:28 PM

#178393 RE: balance_builder #178364

You've been wrong on your buyout theories for years. You've been crying wolf for what seems like an eternity. I said no deal before drilling. I was right. Now I say no deal until drilling results of 5 wells are known by all parties. We will see who is right this time.
icon url

Opus X

09/07/09 7:41 AM

#178405 RE: balance_builder #178364

BB, Door C, please...based on the intersection of SNP's strategy in the JDZ with their treasury of cheapening U.S. $$$, with a bid closer or on SEO's $10/share, with increasing pressure in Nigeria "to monetize" ERHE, with finally some better definition of the oil that lies beneath that all can hang their hats on.

Opus X
icon url

oil-cowboy

09/07/09 6:52 PM

#178478 RE: balance_builder #178364

(A) Please! 5$+ and never look back!

Cheers.

PS- Hope everyone had a great weekend.... especially the rig crews!
icon url

littleBitmoore1

09/08/09 9:43 AM

#178519 RE: balance_builder #178364

I vote "C" I think Sinopec or other perspective buyers will know how to value based on one or two wells. Just my opinion, fwiw.

lbm1