InvestorsHub Logo

TomSawyer

09/02/09 10:52 PM

#184585 RE: Personalizit #184584

I wasn't able to listen today. Did they actually say that during the CC?

If so, a dot just connected! A few weeks back Laura Marriott was asking a Facebook contact about programming services. Gee, now I know why. Wish I would have kept his name!

I'll tell ya, her Facebook friends know more about Neomedia than Neomedia shares with us!

cloud3

09/02/09 11:25 PM

#184586 RE: Personalizit #184584

Personalizit: No, not at all. For one thing, it's a bare-bones operation, and if their interest is indeed to be purchased as their filings have suggested, remember that development companies tend to prefer to have their own programmers involved, especially when it comes to backend systems. Neomedia has patents for systems they have created, but it doesn't necessarily mean that it's important that the actual programming and development they have done is what's ultimately put to use. Readers have become dime a dozen; some are better than others. Same is true for something like neosphere. EG, say company XYZ is interested in NEOM, and it's a company that has its own developers...it would likely be interested in NEOM mainly for its IP, not necessarily for the software and systems it has created around its IP. It might want to build its own version of a 'neosphere' for better integration with its existing systems.

JPetroInc

09/03/09 6:20 AM

#184590 RE: Personalizit #184584

NeoReader was never an in-house development

12Snap was involved awhile back, so I guess you can say that it was outsourced even back then...besides, readers are numerous and common. Its the backend where the $ will be made if/when they ever get it together.

Best, JP