InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

cloud3

09/02/09 12:22 PM

#184439 RE: supersee #184437

Interesting post, supersee...

I don't care a whiff about a shareholder's meeting, and am not sure why it has been such a point of focus when there are more interesting and impactful subjects to discuss...

I must have been at the back of the cue or something because someone got two questions but they never called me up.
icon url

jeffz2

09/02/09 12:36 PM

#184442 RE: supersee #184437

Excellent post 'supersee' - refreshing,

Not sure if I agree with your last statement though, considering what I was just told.

"Finally, there will never be 5B in the float (or anywhere close to that number)."


I would be interested if you shed some light on your views regarding that statement. I know I would appreciate it, as well as many here.

Regardless, thanks for your input - I needed that splash of cold water.

TIA
Jeff
icon url

NeomRocket

09/02/09 12:44 PM

#184445 RE: supersee #184437

Breath of fresh air....thank you.
icon url

roadog

09/02/09 1:22 PM

#184467 RE: supersee #184437

Well said Supersee..I agree with your post
We are closer now than ever before
I thought the CC was POSITIVE!!!
Modest revenue increase
Expense,s down
R&D expense down
No reverse split
Very positive on new deals
And also I might add that I LOVED the questions and answer part of the program..Straight to the heart..no pussyfootting around..Hard Hitting
Cheers and congrats to all who asked the right questions
You are my todays hero's
icon url

diamondtech

01/14/10 8:49 AM

#206068 RE: supersee #184437

supersee you still feel the same way per your post 184437..
quote from that post


My connection to NEOM began in 2005. My interests are aligned with the retail shareholders.

As it is that I know quite a bit about past regimes, my opinion is that Iain & Co. represent the first real chance to make a business out of so many promises made in the past.

The steps they have made with YA are in the favor of all shareholders.

Holding an SHM would be meaningless to the shareholders on this board, except to offer more of the same - a place to vent frustrations (which ends up being counterproductive).

The current BOD is better than any past BOD. I expect it will only improve.

Guys like srowen must be lovin' the present self-immolation on this board...
(since his game is to increase the chance that neom will cease to exist)

I know that in 2005 the investors in Scanbuy did not expect neom to last beyond 2006.

Iain's strategy to reduce cash burn, and therefore *future* dependence on YA, is a viable and well considered approach. Crossover to self-funding will come sooner.

Ultimately this market opportunity represents a test of wills.

Finally, there will never be 5B in the float (or anywhere close to that number).



please do tell I'am all ears..