InvestorsHub Logo

spongeboy

08/31/09 10:10 PM

#180688 RE: rubellite0013 #180661

The 10k was finished on or before August 24th

Deloitte & Touche would NEVER have allowed their name to be used in a PR unless they had a formal engagement contract signed. They would NEVER have agreed to be our auditor without doing Due Diligence on the company including a review of the 10k. We would NEVER have let Robison Hill go unless the 10k was finished, audited, completed and signed. The only possible reason for a delay is the SEC EDGAR people are busy .. or.....something happened this week that they want to include in the "subsequent events" section of the 10k. This could be anything, but most likely extremely good news. If you are new read the ibox - if you liked this post read member spongeboy.

Your theory is BULLSH*&*!


Posted by: rubellite0013 Date: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:54:14 PM
In reply to: CYRXorbust who wrote msg# 180642 Post # of 180664 [Send a link via email]

Here is my theory of the situation. SPNG management thought the 10-K was done and finished but Robison, Hill & Co (the dismissed accountants) started to drag their feet to get back at SPNG for firing them this late in the Q by forcing a late filing. A late filing will bring irate shareholders when stock declines so they get a little revenge against SPNG.
Reference for future: Never fire employees especially around this same time as they have you by the short hairs if they want.

Spinosaurus

09/01/09 2:29 AM

#180897 RE: rubellite0013 #180661

Rube: 1. SPNG is NOT late if they filed an extension or as Alfie indicated on Yahoo last day is Tues. sounds like it will be filled on Tues AH.

2. Rubeson weren't employees of company. They wre hired under contract to serformm a service, i.e., do the audit for FY 2009. Mgmt.

3. PR a few days ago indicated that as of filing of 10k C&T would take over as auditors/ accountants. The Robeson audit of '09 has been done for some time as C&T would have had to look at it prior to taking on an OTC BB company.

4. You are wrong on all counts.

Myis

09/01/09 3:05 AM

#180908 RE: rubellite0013 #180661

makes sense to me.