Replies to post #35145 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[fourkids_9pets]

no one <imo> is counting chickens
they are taking in what jd said on
the CC .. and digesting it ..

he clearly states .. what is what
in regards to prohibitive freight
charges .. necessitating in licensing
agreements .. and product being
manufactured overseas <obviously to
stay competitive and impact the bottom
line>

that said .. none of us know what is
going to be *launched* on the 15th
and what details will be articulated

this conversation will be a lot easier
to have on 9/16 .. ;-)

--
4kids
all jmo

[Renee]

ANY company that establishes PRIOR ART simultaneously to a patent application has all rights to enforcing the patent against patent infringement , even a few years later upon patent approval .

Patent Pending status is powerful just because of the international regard for PRIOR ART .

Licencing the processes and specifications to foreign companies is essentially FREE MONEY because the owner of the pending patent doesn't have to invest any of the manufacturing costs and is paid a royalty just on the processes and specifications alone . Logically , the owner of a pending patent in the country of origin would ALSO need to apply for identical patents in the countries of origin of the licencees . EXPO Holdings would need to apply for identical patents in any country they plan to licence their proprietary product(s) .

Howz about those chickens .

[The Financier]

"has not sold a single unit, does not even have a retailer signed on"


I wouldn't be so sure about this...in the coming days you may come to find out you are COMPLETELY and TOTALLY 100% wrong.


In my opinion EXPH's NEW PROPRIETARY PRODUCT does have a HUGE RETAILER backing it and quite possibly a LARGE ORDER placed already.


NOW THINK ABOUT THAT....


ya never know.... just have to wait and see ; )

jmho