SpongeBoy--your thesis on price per share is valid if this Co's, PE EVER followed conventional wisdom. I've been buying this stock for the last yr, and have gotten most of my shrs when the PE was BELOW 1 and a PEG at about .1. My point--a PE of 15 (trailing) should be right as a conservative valuation--but hasn't traded there for any period of time. Hell, IMO a fair valueation should be based on the PEG (price = Earning x Growth) and most analists use a growth rate of 35 when coming up with a 5 yr forcast for Co like SPNG (earnings in the J curve) even when earnings are growing at 400-800%. If that metric was used, "fair value" would be a PEG between 1 and two, with a PE between 35 and 70. Will we ever atcheive those valuations and price multiples? IMO, only when we get to Nas. When will that come? 6 mo? 1 yr? 2? Who cares, it will come and who can argue with a 10-50 bagger in a yr or so. This is still a buy and hold, with hair pulling frustrations based on trader minipulation and volitility.