A Judgment Defense Specialist may corner Goldblatt as a competent witness... as read in previous cases, Greenbut has only shown Competence where it suits him.
At best, the party who fails to appear will have a judgment entered against him/her whether it was served by mail or not. Failure to answer a summons is simply tantamount to admitting the allegations in the complaint are true and judgment should be entered as requested.
And yes, a filing of affidavit of claim of lien could be placed against Goldblatt for "the hammer" we assume Don is bringing, should this settlement requested meeting not be Judged upon in a summery manner to where negation of cross debts are indicated/recognized and validated by court evidence submissions.
And another date would be set, with a trial possibility. but that is a riskey road, if the "hammer" is larger that the nail.
While Lawyers and parties are in it for their own benefit, Courts really do not like to see things going round and round without termination.
JMHO, but this issue may hang on competent witness with first-hand knowledge situation concerning the collection agent, the relationship inferred thru shell setups and WHO THE HELL, shows up in response to the court directed order on the collection agent side. Without creating a plausible, LACK, of connections between those parties , "Hammer" debtor and CTUM original plaintiff, there may be a situation where Goldblatts "I have no recollection, it's not me" defense is seen by the court as no defense, not evidence and demand any response by original plaintiff to show disparity in the connections between, WHO THE HELL shows up on collection agents part.
The U.S. laws are beneficial to collection of debt, proof of
non indebtedness falls upon the accused much more than is often assumed, check the basis for legal rights for IRS collection for example.
Imo, that 10$ transfer to the Collection Agent, cannot be avoided.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
