I'm happy that you took the time to compose a metaphor about fish. Why, may I humbly ask, haven't you taken the time to answer my two PM's about why you banned me from the SEC8 board?
Apparently my sin was replying to a poster who was asking for an example(s) of a board controlled by bashers. Should I have ignored the poster? Sincere Q.
As we've seen on this board, people we're curious about the board(s) obviously populated with organized pumpers. Is that OT?
In a nutshell, Group A complains about alleged organized "pumping" by Group B. Group B complains about alleged organized "bashing" by Group A. The true underlying basis to both sets of complaints is the subjective content of the other posts; we don't like it and don't think it should be allowed, so let's try and manufacture a rationale by which the content we object to can be stopped. The objectors tend to focus on whatever topic or user(s) are in their sights at the moment, to the exclusion of all else. Tomorrow it'll be something else, and the next day someone else. Meanwhile, the river flows and 99.9% of the fish are oblivious to it.
I would say 85% of the fish are PO'd; the rest unaware. The SAME baseless lies presented as truth have been coming from certain groups for YEARS. This is not something that will change today or tomorrow or next week. The cliche is true. If you say something long enough, people will actually begin to believe it. By your inaction or willful ignorance, iHub seems complicit.