InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

CopperKen

08/24/09 6:17 PM

#32304 RE: Colorado1 #32302

Logically the train siding storage locations would be different for Con & Magnetite. We would not want our Con to be contaminated by residue from previous loads of Magnetite, especially when the latter is loaded regularly.
I repeat my gratitude to you and the others who have been able to visit the mill & mine sites and report back to us.
icon url

Moon II

08/24/09 7:29 PM

#32305 RE: Colorado1 #32302

Colorado -

After all of the discussion and speculation since your visit to the mine do you still believe CPRK is a promising risk for an investor? Has your confidence level in the company's potential increased, decreased or is it about the same? Just looking for your opinion if you care to share it.

Thanks
Moon (also from Colorado)
icon url

wcharlie

08/24/09 8:21 PM

#32310 RE: Colorado1 #32302

where the con is in your pics must be on a bed of con not to be contaminated? was it a good size area where that takes place? when dried does it look like whats behind the con in pic #4? see where the loaders are stacking something