InvestorsHub Logo

kubotapete

08/22/09 6:57 PM

#4318 RE: kittystwigster #4317

Kitty,
Please explain your last post, what is Solomon opposing and why? Thanks for all your input.
Pete

look1

08/27/09 9:06 AM

#4384 RE: kittystwigster #4317

2 CENTS REPLY TO NOT a CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION HEARING That was in reply to looking for a favorable ruling on the claim constructon ruling If you go to fvestar post 4285 menorndum go to PDF 6 (pdf 1 http://freepdfhosting.com/cbd349f71c.pdf
pdf 2 http://freepdfhosting.com/98368dc10c.pdf
pdf 3 http://freepdfhosting.com/79f610e218.pdf
pdf 4 http://freepdfhosting.com/70f65ecb1a.pdf
pdf 5 http://freepdfhosting.com/55c349d0fa.pdf
pdf 6 http://freepdfhosting.com/1e8b65c5e7.pdf ) read 5 to 12 espically 5 and 11 IF you want go to post 4227 the PATENT LINK when you are their move you curser to the left and move it down if I rember right in the 280s it will some where state a patentenee will have the right to a civil court and it will be up to the defence to prove they didn't infringe. So if toyota went their ( see artical in ihub Wall Street Journal (Takashi Nagase, chief of
Toyota’s advanced engine group in
North America, says his company is
“very interested.” ) they have to prove they didn't and the only they can prove they didn't This arm chair expert LOL says the judge will have to be on SOLM side in the summery judgement. To me if Toyota looses this court case they can't sell their prius in Japan because SOLM has their patent their. I can be corrected it is just my opinon