Replies to post #175725 on ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[RUBY1100]

Why Risk our Free Carry and piss our partners off for a little PR

We have specific Confidentialty Agreements and NDA's
that only the operator can PR events, simple

by Adding the Ticker requires additional legal consent and has other implications - I'm sure we would if we could.

WE HAVE RUN from $0.10 to $0.90 with very little official news from our partners -

lots more news is coming

In fact there will be so much news we wont be able to read it all .....

Dan K has done a great job in polishing our image, our PRs have never been better, our web site is now Tip-Top, our Corp. image is improving, SEC Filings are flowing and updated, and we appear to be finally getting the respect by the investment community we deserve.

we have come a long way from releasing only 1 PR a year to now multiple PRs a month, Conf Calls, Presentations, Trade Shows, Investment Road Shows etc.

This is before a single Drill Bit has even started

its all good ...

[CobraJet]

wd, that's destructive behavior.

What are you thinking?

After all these years when we've come to the precipice of rewards...yeah, let's start pissing our handlers off.

I don't get it.

[tryoty]

This has been explained on this board multiple time by Dan Keeney. If the CFO of Addax and/or Sinopec say we can, then we can use their ticker in out PR's. We have to approach them each and every time. We have to make a case why we want to do it. And we have to show how us doing so benefits them. If they don't see value in us doing it the permission will not be granted.

We may be partners, but we *are* still competitors.

Let Sinopec and Addax PR to their hearts content. Have you ever tried to google "JDZ" and *not* get ERHC plastered all over your screen? The world will find us, starting now!

[miamidrift]

Thank you Walldog for a couple of reasons.
One,for recognizing my post.
Two,more importantly, you have caught the tenor of the message. I am not antagonistic to anyone, these thoughts are sincere and driven to protect our rights.

You have succinctly said what we all should consider and I hope you and others realize my thoughts were not to go it alone on this issue but bring it before the board. You will be most surprised, I would rather let others exert their leadership in addressing this issue. I am not afraid to do it but it is better discussed and addressed with consensus of others.