If we can (just for fun) disregard the fact that Dr Leatt is making a lot of money compared to what the company is making (which is worrying and will probably be discussed at the shareholder meeting), there's been a lot of progress, for example:
You said it all my friend. It all really is this simple.
Whenever the owner of a company, that is publicly traded, sucks out as much money for himself as the company makes, you've got a serious problem and conflict.
By the way, is anyone going to ask about his fraud conviction at the shareholder meeting? We've all been curious to the details of this.