drdre...good information and much of what I found.
In my post I clearly referenced the 100m - 200m levels as being borderline, and am in full agreement with you there.
However I doubt either of our credentials could classify as experts to make any final conclusions on geological mining phenomenon. It's borderline based on what we know, but to draw conclusions with no expert qualifications...well let's just say it's best to leave it with the experts.
It was 235m SE that caught my attention.
I'll repeat from my previous post on the subject, the contrast in results at the 235m SE level is remarkable compared to the more shallow levels that I researched, which you pointed out.
Those positive results at deeper levels are what they are.
Shore Gold's comments are very encouraging about these most recent finds, and they are justified for them. It has been a lot of hard, deeply researched work that is no small task. Results similar or better than those at 235 SE at deeper levels will prove their current beliefs. Results to the contrary won't. However they are on a better track the deeper they go.
Be well, Bo
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
