InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

alj14

08/16/09 5:42 PM

#677 RE: stervc #674

Stervc,

That comparison with the figures for NEPH is illuminating.

There was very clear positive differentiation in the ASCO report between Cobroxin and Ultram.

alj
icon url

Bakerman_06

08/16/09 5:47 PM

#678 RE: stervc #674

Nice post. I expect to see 20c this week alone.
icon url

art35

08/16/09 6:50 PM

#679 RE: stervc #674

The following drugs were/are for osteo-arthritis suffers i believe----chronic pain yes--but a specific diagnosis pain--

Does our drug fit in here???

The clinical study below conducted by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) confirmed that Cobroxin, for chronic pain, is better than Ultram (tramadol hydrochloride) and would be better than Celebrex and Vioxx because of not having the side effects reported from Celebrex and Vioxx:
http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Meetings/Abstracts?&vmview=abst_detail_view&confID=16&abstractID=1762
icon url

ToyotaMR2s

08/16/09 7:30 PM

#685 RE: stervc #674

great post stervc:)
icon url

Chickadee

08/17/09 7:55 AM

#693 RE: stervc #674

Great DD! A large part of my portfolio is in NEPH, which has been doing well. They still have 2 FDA approvals and a DOD contract(s) right around the corner. The stock should exceed $3 shortly, and climb to $5-7 thereafter... giving them a good opportunity to relist back on AMEX.

I noticed XCHO back on 7/25/09 from doing my usual research on hidden gems. At that time, there was hardly any activity... and it appeared as if Xenacare was a dead stock. I kept it on my watch list, for many reasons. Kudos to $heff for bringing so much attention to XCHO. This company is definitely undervalued, with a ton of potential.

I will be looking for an entry point, to buy shares this week.