Replies to post #163049 on Simply Politics & News (GOV)

[jcamp]

She's not 'part of'.

wow, you

are brainless....never mind.

[brainlessone]

here read this

H.R. 3200, page 425: Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), the term ‘advance care planning consultation’ means a consultation between the individual and a practitioner described in paragraph (2) regarding advance care planning, if, subject to paragraph (3), the individual involved has not had such a consultation within the last 5 years. Such consultation shall include the following:

(A) An explanation by the practitioner of advance care planning, including key questions and considerations, important steps, and suggested people to talk to.

(B) An explanation by the practitioner of advance directives, including living wills and durable powers of attorney, and their uses.

(C) An explanation by the practitioner of the role and responsibilities of a health care proxy.

(D) The provision by the practitioner of a list of national and State-specific resources to assist consumers and their families with advance care planning … .

(E) An explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice, and benefits for such services and supports that are available under this title.

(F)(i) Subject to clause (ii), an explanation of orders regarding life sustaining treatment or similar orders … .


and think about what fact check says.

fact check simply doesnt talk about the obvious. I dont know why

do you really want a whole beuracracy paid from your tax dollars to visit 40 million people every 5 years and discuss " life sustaining measures"

think about the cost of this, let alone the content