InvestorsHub Logo

hangdog

07/29/09 9:36 PM

#181452 RE: JPetroInc #181444

I work in Colorado Springs. I will have to go pickup a copy when I am back next week.

BTW, the deal with CH comes at a really good time. It can be used as leverage in the case against ScamBuy. Add in a couple of more licensing deals and bingo Scambuy will be toast.

They did not do the heavy lifting. They only screwed up the marketplace by trying to do everything proprietary. With them out of the picture the MC2, OMA, GSM, blah blah blah can set the standard and move out without ScamBuy. I say put them out of business with treble damages. And I am in a good mood.

whizknock

07/29/09 10:53 PM

#181462 RE: JPetroInc #181444

JPetroInc! I love Colorado Springs. I like the fact they "claim to be the FIRST"! It kind of gives one the sense that everyone knows this is the future. More & more papers will have QR Codes throughout as time goes on.

Also I got your PM. Yep. good luck to us all. Not only did I continue to buy on a dip now & then I talked to 3 friends who've taken a nice size position & they in turn have spread the word over the past 4 or 5 months. These people are not traders so much as they were looking for a lottery pick in the form of a stock that might exceed expecdtations. We were on the phone & E-mailing each other today talking about the significance of this "FIRST" licensing deal. We all agree this is still a risk but that risk factor is diminishing & of all the penny stocks out there this is the one with the most probability to scorch the charts.

And speaking of charts, after today, ours has set up to give the appearence that can only be discribed as explosive. No guarantees,,, but without exception,,, all indicators are Bullish.


Best of luck to us all!!!

jonesieatl

07/30/09 6:25 AM

#181486 RE: JPetroInc #181444

Think one of Neomedia's 'strategic alliances' ...

... managed to pull this off? I mean, they're in Colorado and that alliance began nearly a year ago.

http://neom.com/press-detail.php?id=15

Probably not.

So, is it QR codes throughout the paper? Nobody felt/saw the need for an indirect code?

jonesie