Replies to post #148716 on Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[xDREWx]

Folks are, very much, getting ahead of themselves once again. Seeing that which isn't there.


I appreciate, as many do, the time spent on your posts. However, I find these remarks out of place.

Regarding getting ahead of ourselves, for over a month you included share prices you believed we would reach along with hints at a variety of news.

In a similar manner you fought those who believed in a short position, yet now you are a proponent for a massive one.

We never came close to hitting any of the numbers you proposed with such certainty. And, here, you blame others for getting ahead of themselves.

Maybe, as the high-profile poster that you are - it would be prudent to omit any blanket statements such as the one above.

Thank You,
Drew

[z4lover]

Stox I quoted here a part of your post which I would like to ask you about.

"And in so doing we'll start with the fact of the Reg. SHO flagging having nothing to do with our 'entrenched' friend. The massive phantom shares position, that is, created last year. Prior to the current regulatory environment being in place. A position being cleverly hidden. And, likely, an offshore situation. A position that management intends to, very soon, expose in full. Demonstrating the reality to both the SEC and DTCC. And to then leverage in full. Achieving four of four. Senior listing."

I understand that the abusive short selling is no longer going on. And further that the recent reg-sho is coming from more recent action, however... Is there any connection you might see between the two? Now I understand they are two different animals, but At the same point they are both of the common goal.

The abusive short selling they did last year no longer being possible, however they still have this massive short position something that no matter how you look at it has to be facilitated by some Market Maker, and thus that they are liable for and are under obligation to at some point cover if they get caught.

See it appears to me that they would have interest to hold us down, in whatever way possible. Those who facilitated them are liable if they can not cover their positions. There has to be margins involved, and those margins must be getting ever increasingly bigger as the PPS increases. .28 cents being a point at which They needed to attack us, It wasn't about the money maybe. It was about the lack of money to put up for margin. A last attempt to keep us down.

Just wondering your thoughts on this. I just find it very odd that this large short position sits and waits for the inevitable cover without any action. That is unless that short position has sold the shares and has jumped ship, and that position was left on a market maker, unknowing the position is either there or unknowing that the naked short sellers have jumped ship...

Any thoughts on this matter would be appreciated.

[Crazy Money]

Too many words, go SPNG going up again this week most likely :-)