InvestorsHub Logo

StephanieVanbryce

07/21/09 12:16 AM

#79875 RE: yayaa #79874

hey - are you for capitalism ?

fuagf

08/24/09 10:56 PM

#80749 RE: yayaa #79874

howdy yayaa, cheating at uni has nothing to do with healthcare either ..

haha .. ya haven't changed .. tell me if you happen to be buy a piece of fruit and when you get home you see it has
a rotten part .. even if half were rotten and the other have good .. would you just throw the good bit away too?

If you would, too bad .. it would be a waste. Many starving children might fight over
it. Some adults even would act in terrible ways. On top of that it would taste good.

Excerpts ..

quality care shouldn't depend on your financial resources, or the type of job you have, or the medical condition you face.

"Our school is closing in June of 2010, which means that I will be losing my job and my health insurance," writes Mary Dunn, a 58-year-old schoolteacher in Eden, S.D. "I am a Type I diabetic, and I had heart bypass surgery in 2005. My husband is also a teacher [here], so we will both be losing insurance. I am exploring options and have been told that I cannot stay on our group policy or transfer to another policy after our jobs cease because of my medical condition. What am I to do after 39 years of teaching to acquire adequate health coverage?" Dunn also serves as mayor of Eden, for which she is paid $45 a month with no health benefits.

countless such stories, including one from the family of ..

Cassandra Wilson, a 14-year-old who once was a competitive ice skater. She's uninsured
because she has petit mal seizures
, often 200 times a day. Her parents have run up $30,000
on their credit cards. They've sold her skating equipment on eBay to pay for her care.

These two cases represent only those patients who lack coverage.

In 1912, when Theodore Roosevelt ran for a third term as president, the
platform of his newly created Progressive Party called for national health insurance.

Harry Truman proposed it again more than 30 years after Roosevelt was defeated.
The plan was attacked, not for the last time, as "socialized medicine," and members
of Truman's White House staff were branded "followers of the Moscow party line."


early 1960s, a new young president was determined to take a first step—to free the elderly from the
threat of medical poverty. John Kennedy called Medicare "one of the most important measures I have advocated."

.. I was in the Senate to vote for the Medicare bill before Lyndon Johnson signed it into law—with Harry Truman at his side.

When I first introduced the bill in 1970, I didn't expect an easy victory (although I never suspected that it would take this long). I eventually came to believe that we'd have to give up on the ideal of a government-run, single-payer system if we wanted to get universal care. Some of my allies called me a sellout because I was willing to compromise. Even so, we almost had a plan that President Richard Nixon was willing to sign in 1974—but that chance was lost as the Watergate storm swept Washington

When Bill Clinton returned to the issue in the first years of his presidency, I fought the battle in
Congress. We lost to a virtually united front of corporations, insurance companies, and other interest groups.

... Sen. Nancy Landon Kassebaum of Kansas, the daughter of the 1936 Republican presidential nominee, I crafted a law to make health insurance more portable for those who change or lose jobs. It didn't do enough to fully guarantee that, but we made progress.

I worked with my friend Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the Republican chair of our committee, to enact CHIP, the Children's Health Insurance Program; today it covers more than 7 million children from low-income families, although too many of them could soon lose coverage as impoverished state governments cut their contributions.

Incremental measures won't suffice anymore.

I was on the phone, and I've kept at it. ..... So have my Senate colleagues—in particular Max Baucus, the chair of the Finance Committee, and my friend and partner in this mission, Chris Dodd.

Even those most ardently opposed to reform in the past have been willing to make constructive gestures now.

To help finance a bill, the pharmaceutical industry has agreed to lower prices for seniors,

Senator Baucus has agreed with hospitals on more than $100 billion in savings.

I long ago learned that you have to be a realist as you pursue your ideals. But whatever the compromises,
there are several elements that are essential to any health-reform plan worthy of the name.

First, we have to cover the uninsured. .. Clinton .. 33 million Americans had no
health insurance .. Today .. 47 million .. 55 million .. even as the economy recovers.

All Americans should be required to have insurance. For those who can't afford the premiums, we can provide subsidies.

We also need to move from a system that rewards doctors for the sheer volume of tests and treatments ...

... we have to make certain that people can keep the coverage they already have.

We need to prevent disease and not just cure it.

... I'm open to many options, including a surtax on the wealthy, as long as it meets
the principle laid down by President Obama: that there will be no tax increases on anyone making
less than $250,000 a year. What I haven't heard the critics discuss is the cost of inaction.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/207406

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39723132