InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Mr Biggerstaff

07/20/09 1:16 PM

#163651 RE: enzymesarecool #163650

very nice sir.

don't forget to mention the farm as an asset even though eeso doesn't own it and the mortgage payable even though it's a land contract.

also, where in the hell did that "goodwill" number come from? who did eeso acquire to justify goodwill of close to a million smackers?

the $3 million plus of the formulas is also a joke.

i agree, i bet the cpa firm walks out before cash is audited.
icon url

boehmer

07/20/09 2:01 PM

#163662 RE: enzymesarecool #163650

enzymes,

Well although I don't do audits anymore, I worked on several audits as a CPA for Ernst & Young several years ago. I did audits for clients as small as an 8 person company to as big as Harley Davidson and Oshkosh Truck. Where do I begin; your comments again expose your ignorance on the subject. With companies as small as EESO with so much in flux during these changing and growing periods, the large differences in operating margin are easily understandable and not even worth mentioning. Your other arguments with the mysterious problem of all the 000's is laughable. That is definitely something worth giving a negative audit finding over. "Dear shareholders of EESO, we attest to the fact that there are no material errors in the financial statements as reported however, We are very concerned with the 000's in the income figures shown and therefore cannot confirm any of our findings."