InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Threw-er-back

07/19/09 10:20 AM

#58393 RE: OntaREEo #58391

Thanks Onta.I think this may be closer to where it'll shake out..we'll see
icon url

credoro

07/19/09 10:26 AM

#58394 RE: OntaREEo #58391

Thanks OntaReeo for your big work.I am from switzerland and i was buying SRSR shares in the beginning of this year because of your informations.Now i am holding many 100000's shares and wait for the report. Next week could be the week....
icon url

webpence

07/19/09 12:01 PM

#58429 RE: OntaREEo #58391

Thanks for the update! Can we get a sticky?
icon url

dragon52

07/19/09 1:28 PM

#58443 RE: OntaREEo #58391

so if I am looking at your chart...

it implies that ONLY the niobium is taken into account and no other precious metals and ores are; is that correct?

Thus it would make that chart very conservative in valuation since other metals could be also in the mix such as gold, silver, etc... which is valued at a much higher rate....

interesting... your .27 - .30 is very conservative, but practical.

nice chart.
icon url

jim6103

07/19/09 1:43 PM

#58449 RE: OntaREEo #58391

OntaREEo....Great work on the "Bible" for the future PPS. It sure takes a lot of guess work out of the game.
icon url

Threw-er-back

07/19/09 1:51 PM

#58453 RE: OntaREEo #58391

If I understand the method to the madness a typical valuation lets say at 5% will increase as it's compliance level increases?