Replies to post #10787 on One Step Ahead

[Bo14172]

Let me start discussing it further...

Right now SGGM's share price is 200 times higher than CMKX. (.08/.0004).

Let's go very conservative on the O/S for SGGM. Let's say SGGM's O/S is 210 billion. (this includes the 200 billion RS).
This leaves them a tradable float of merely 10 billion, with still a 950 billion share A/S which is known to the market.

Let's forget for 1 minute that CMKX has multiple times more intrisic value than SGGM. Let's assume they were valued equally.

Thus if their SGGM's share price is 200 times CMKX, then how does this relate to the O/S given my conservative suggestion above? 10 billion x 200= 2 trillion shares.

Does anyone in their right mind think that CMKX has a 2 trillion share float??
I don't.

Either I am underestimating the naked shorting problem here, or there is the biggest disparity in Share Pricing I have ever seen.

But reality paints an even more impressive picture because the fact is clear that CMKX has MANY TIMES MORE VALUE THAN SGGM.

To me this is interesting folks. Something is either very rotten here, or we may well be on the verge of a historic breakout. : )

I welcome anybody's thoughts.

Be well, Bo

[sandgoat]

Bo14172, Its hard for me to put any long term faith in a recently risen shell. If I new where the 10MM$$$ came from, that would help enormously. That would add the credibility necessary to keep me from pounding the worry beads. LOL. Two questions really need to be answered at least in part. #1. Very brief overview of Sask. meeting without divulgence of proprietary info. #2. Mineral results. The shorts will be a bonus. Thanks for listening. Sandgoat

[Bo14172]

Correction in my #10782 post.

The post should read:

SGGM - 950 billion Authorized Shares
CMKX - 800 billion Authorized Shares


Sorry about any confusion there.
The A/S is what I meant and just mistyped it. It doesn't change at all the point of the post because A/S is what I wanted to type in the first place. : )

Bo

[onyx pup]

Sorry Bo, I didn't read your post yesterday. I'm not a Sterling follower, but I liked what I read and decided I would post it here. I will pay more attention to your postings in the future.