InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Coopermun

07/08/09 4:16 PM

#35790 RE: gink #35789

Thanks for some real news, Gink....nice to hear from you....how's the misses and the buddy from creek country...?

I think sales will be knocking this stock to the.....:-)

That's why I'm buying Friday.....that and all the bids on support here and still no insider trading.......

icon url

duke00324

07/08/09 4:51 PM

#35791 RE: gink #35789

...you guys certainly do spend an exorbitant amount of time...

...posting, dissecting, debating and "fretting" about a frivolous lawsuit...

...why not re-read that December shareholder letter and dissect, debate and fret about the lack of execution and the abundance of miscues associated with it...Duke...
icon url

calitrader

07/08/09 5:08 PM

#35792 RE: gink #35789

Great info another confirmation LIQR is on thier way out of BIZ soon and just taking desperate measures to unload shares.

DKAM on the up n up.
icon url

BCInvestor

07/08/09 5:34 PM

#35793 RE: gink #35789

Wrong, wrong and wrong information. Perhaps you need a lesson in WIPO Law.

Now you are bashing a privatly held company that is not even owned by LIQR. What's next, bashing the electric company for turning off the power at DKAM because they can't pay their bills?

Look in the archives of the Southern District Federal Court (Jacksonville, FL) & the Federal Court of Appeals in Atlanta, you will find that Happy Vodka Corporation was already sued and already won their battle on the smiley face, and they had the trademark prior to Wal-Mart's use, which began in 2002, which IMO is why Happy Vodka can continue to use the trademark and Wal-Mart cannot.

Again, nothing to do with DKAM yet you continue to post.