InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

LOL

07/03/09 3:44 PM

#35672 RE: sneaky_peaky #35671

Based on how shareholders have been treated here, I'd have to say DKAM is probably in the wrong here, it goes along with everything else they have and haven't done in the past year. Remember how they lost the $10M LOC, then many said they did it on purpose, even though there was an 8k to prove otherwise. If they weren't in the wrong on the LIQR situation they would have put out a PR by now, at least that's what most shareholder loving companies do.IMO
icon url

duke00324

07/03/09 3:48 PM

#35673 RE: sneaky_peaky #35671

...still having difficulty identifying any shortcomings...

...that Drinks' Americas might have?...

...keep up the "pertinacious" DD...I'm sure you'll find a thing or two...Duke...
icon url

P K G

07/03/09 4:56 PM

#35676 RE: sneaky_peaky #35671

"if PK had wanted to buy LIQR".

"he has been on the acquisition trail for some time".

With what?

Not money.

There has been none. Now credit only for receivables.
No money for buying another company. Has not been and will not be, IMO.