Yes, it's hard but happens everyday. I agree that a lawfirm or the authorities should look into it. Imo both, but I cannot agree with your safe harbor statement. This is a non reporting pink. Safe harbor doesn't prevent them of anything!
They did lie about the patents and trademarks, those infamous PRs were never corrected and they did use that trademark symbol till the end.
They lied about even everything of what they ever released.
The announced joint venture with SFB in symbol management was listed till the end at the website. I'm curious if they had even anything to show to SFB to justify that announcement. I doubt it.
Don't forget the even more infamous launch in February 2008, the face to face lies about immeditedly incoming revenues from customers which obviousely didn't exist.
Like I wrote 18 months ago, we could start with...This "was" a Nevada incorporated company
Add the points, they are here, countless!
And finally but I left out several important points, this thing was sold via an internet boards scheme play with several promoters who should be known by now.
I would start with Hensel here if I would be a lawyer in the States. Ihub alone delivers more evidence than any beginner would need.
It is pretty easy to add one and one!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
