InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

calitrader

06/26/09 2:03 PM

#35367 RE: sneaky_peaky #35366

These two charts would be nice to have in the ibox.



icon url

Toxic Avenger

06/26/09 2:10 PM

#35368 RE: sneaky_peaky #35366

Uh, not according to the SEC -
3. Do all failures to deliver reflect improper activity that should be closed out?

A "fail to deliver" occurs when a broker-dealer fails to deliver securities to the party on the other side of the transaction on settlement date. There are many justifiable reasons why broker-dealers do not or cannot deliver securities on settlement date. A broker-dealer may experience a problem that is either unanticipated or is out of its control, such as (1) delays in customers delivering their shares to a broker-dealer, (2) the inability to obtain borrowed shares in time for settlement, (3) issues related to the physical transfer of securities, or (4) the failure of a broker-dealer to receive shares it had purchased to fulfill its delivery obligations. Fails to deliver can result from both long and short sales.

Regulation SHO was designed to target potentially problematic failures to deliver. Prevention of fails is the goal of the locate requirement. Regulation SHO requires broker-dealers to identify a source of borrowable stock before executing a short sale in any equity security with the goal of reducing the number of situations where stock is unavailable for settlement. But, because the locate is usually done three days before settlement, the stock may not be available from the source at the time of settlement, possibly resulting in a fail.

Regulation SHO also requires some fail positions to be closed out. When a broker-dealer has a fail position in a "threshold security," and that fail position has persisted for 13 consecutive settlement days, the broker-dealer must take immediate steps to close-out the fail by purchasing securities of like kind and quantity. Even market makers that have such persistent fails in threshold securities must close-out their positions.
icon url

Toxic Avenger

06/26/09 2:13 PM

#35369 RE: sneaky_peaky #35366

They also warn:
12. I read on an internet chat room or website that a specific security has a large number of fails; are these sources reliable?

Investors should always be cautious that issuers, promoters, or shareholders may be seeking to stimulate buying interest by making false, misleading or unfounded statements in internet chat rooms or other such forums about alleged large naked short positions in some smaller issuers, particularly those trading on the OTCBB or Pink Sheets. Some individuals may encourage other investors to buy these issuers' securities by claiming that there will be an imminent "short squeeze," in which the alleged naked short sellers will be forced to cover open short positions at increasing prices. These claims in fact may be false.
http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/keyregshoissues.htm

Please be careful.
icon url

duke00324

06/26/09 3:24 PM

#35384 RE: sneaky_peaky #35366

...glad I could help sneak and all of the longs...

...here who believe him locate the truth which they were desperately seeking...

...pay SPECIAL ATTENTION to paragraph 5!...

...http://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/failsdata.htm

...thorough DD requires one to keep his eyes open and his opinion open-minded...

...sorry if the truth hurts...Duke...