InvestorsHub Logo

f1fans

06/25/09 1:36 PM

#118782 RE: mretgnol #118781

You forget that Mr.Megas had his hands tied while the DTCC was telling him his best alternatives were.

Art2Gecko

06/25/09 1:49 PM

#118783 RE: mretgnol #118781

Well perhaps Megas was getting bad legal advice from Clem and crew back in 2005 in regard to Cap Growth, but even so, covering those shares took care of the actual fails that the counterfeits created, so in theory, BCIT should have been tradable and clearable.

But, since all the retail brokerages sold (read naked shorted) perhaps 2 Billion more shares to the public, there are no certs available to back them up.

The DTCC knew what was going on by 8/11/2005, and put out their notice on 8/16/2005 if I recall, but the stock still traded for two more weeks after this. They only exascerbated an already growing fail problem by not shutting it down completely.

The problem BCIT has now is not with the fails created by the counterfeit certs, but with the much larger naked short positions created by retail brokers taking orders even after the 8/16/2005 DTC notice.

mastaflash

06/25/09 2:24 PM

#118785 RE: mretgnol #118781

You say the DTC is not responsible for determining real shares from bogus ones....yet they appear to making that judgment now...after the fact. How do you account for this? Seems to me they are protecting their owners...and you know who they are...if this trades, the owners are left holding the bag for any bogus shares their clients hold, whether they be counterfeit physical shares...or the NSS kind. Also, what about the MMs that used the 'Madoff Exemption' to make a market for shares that did not exist in the quantities demanded? What about those air shares?