InvestorsHub Logo

SPARK

06/15/09 11:09 PM

#50420 RE: Max Power #50419

Nice one~

zeptepi

06/15/09 11:17 PM

#50422 RE: Max Power #50419

tex.....I will confirm your statement about the REE's. I had emailed Merle earlier today with the same question. No REE commentary and assay values in the upcoming report.

Emergcy

06/16/09 2:15 AM

#50423 RE: Max Power #50419

Texas, if I would have to define the strategy of what and when to announce, I would also go first with Niob only. Its good to have news in the backhand whenever you need them and it is necessary to bring news from time to time to keep the fire ongoing. I would bring a big bang (D- zone indicated, inferred, SE zone estimated) and then every month something in addition on REE, more hole results...
But have no worries at all, as I know that Scott can play this "piano" anyway perfectly. He doesnt need our support. I believe he was happy to have IHUB 1 year ago, now he is completly independend from all. He will do a correct job!

mytvsbroke

06/16/09 10:32 AM

#50438 RE: Max Power #50419

Ripper, I remember we had a geologist on this board who has not posted in a good while, I don't remember his name, if it was the Good Life Geo or another, but he commented the Dominion Gulf historical data is quite incredible in it's detail compared to what he was used to seeing. IMO that not only is that body of work a MAJOR asset, the case perhaps can be made it has and will continue to save time and money, until the next round {OR SO} of drilling outdistances that work. That company spent a million bucks 60 years ago and we should all be reminded of what that represents in today's dollars. I cannot imagine a scenario where we don't have current and medium term benefit.