I've never seen eye to eye with A2 on many matters.(I don't actually have a problem with his orientation just the positions he's taken)
Anyway, I asked about tungsten because you are supposed to have "knowledge" of mining. A2 is a jeweler and I wouldn't expect him to know that sort of thing.
On the subject of Walter: I think he has promised a great deal to his shareholders... and not delivered. I understand that this is Walter's company, or should I say it was. He seems to have forgotten that he sold it... to us.
Here's a partial list of what I can only describe as duplicity on his part:
*extensive claims and advanced work in Ukraine (and the implication that this was what we bought into.)
*mini bulk samples to be done in Ukraine
*extensive knowledge and connections in Ukraine
*Harvey Thorliefson has agreed to assist us! (ok technically yes, but hardly what was implied n'cest pas? (sp?)
*Application to OTCBB to be completed by year end 2003.
*presentation of filings to the shareholders in Feb 2004, as precursor to SEC filing.
*Tranch? no details yet
*Funding? no details
Walter is pretty genial when you talk to him, but he's uncommunicative when it comes to relevant company information. The basic standard and requirement of the SEC is supposed to be transparency. The shareholders are not required to guess at what management knows. It must be shared.
Walter doesn't meet this standard. If you wish to argue that there are fewer requirements on the pink sheets, by all means argue that. But if you think the company should be taken seriously, well... You can't have it both ways.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
