Replies to post #8065 on SEC Charges Eleven in Stock Manipulation Ring

[janice shell]

Your membership, or lack of one, is highly relevant, as without one you'd never be able to prove you were "scammed by IHub".

I'm quite able to follow. According to the SEC and the DOJ, Matt did manipulate stocks, launder money, and so on. He and his co-conspirators, the latter for the most part, did post about the stocks in question.

How that affected YOU is what I'm unable to see. Permit me to point out that the stocks in question actually went UP, which has not been the case with some recent promotions.

Was what they did wrong? Absolutely. Will it land them in jail? Very likely. But for everyone who's ever lost money on a penny stock to blame Matt for it is just childish.

It's also an attitude that's likely to ensure further losses in future. Learn to do DD.

[lentinman]

Grand:

"The scam is: matt/ihub perpetrated a crime on the public by intensionally and illegally misrepresenting information in a public stock forum where decisions are sometimes made based on the information provided such as Matts/ihubs phony PR's on ihub."

You have zero evidence of that! It's your opinion. It's not even in the articles of indictment. You just fabricated it.

Len