FAZ=W stock? Not sure it works for indexes, let alone inverse ETFs. The third criteria -news- is sort of missing unless you count the TBond crackup. We're a bit skeptical but there might be some [weaker] predictive association. FAZ will be a test case although one example won't prove or disprove anything. Fabian
Part of the reason W and D works is due to market inefficiency. It also works because bad news is more likely after bad news and good news is more likely after positive news. It would take a while to explain the nature of the inefficency. Just got bad from a hard weight workout. Not in the in depth 'splanin mood. [g]