Replies to post #5045 on SEC Charges Eleven in Stock Manipulation Ring

[plastipunk]

You are correct janice!

[sidedraft]

One of my post was Admin reviewed, and deemed to be off topic. It had two links for the SEC and DOJ postings as in the iBox here.

The final arbiter of truth...............Ta Da:

IH Admin [Matt] on 05/21/09 12:42:57 PM:

[Billybob_TX]

Destroying potential evidence couldn't be very helpful to his case I reckon.

[clarity789]

My head is spinning from all the info and circumstantial evidence being presented here Janice. But I have to say it makes me feel a bit more secure that you are the lead mod here, and wanted to thank you for taking on the task.

I'm a bit surprised that both you and Bishop are keeping your thoughts/DD to yourselves - but perhaps thats wise at this point.

Re Matt: I'm only certain about one thing... it is difficult to focus on facts when so few are available, and when so many present what appears to be a breadcrumb trail that, taken as a whole, could easily sway one to abandon objectivity.

I'm still clinging to only the facts... but damned if it isn't tempting to make the leap and make a judgement call here.

FWIW, I fully endorse the idea that Matt needs to be relieved of his duties - or voluntarily withdraw from IHUB for the time being.

[kenco]

janice shell, I cant believe his own personal attorney hasnt strongly advised him to stay away, far away, he has criminal charges aimed directly at him and you can bet your last dollar that people are paying close attention to what he does, US Attorney likes to play with a stacked deck.